Review website, WordPress, hosting, access, backup and configuration risks, then turn findings into practical remediation steps.
Audits are scoped around the systems you own and the access available for review.

Users, roles, passwords, admin paths, and avoidable exposure.

Core software, plugins, themes, libraries, and unsupported components.

Hosting account settings, file exposure, SSL, backups, and obvious configuration risks.

Recovery process, backup freshness, and whether backups are protected from live-site issues.

Existing alerts, uptime checks, logging, and signs that problems would be spotted.

Findings grouped into practical next steps rather than vague warnings.
Audits are useful before hardening, after rapid growth, before a handover, or when you need a second opinion.

For sites where risk is unclear and decisions need plain-language evidence.

For plugin-heavy sites, admin-heavy workflows, and older WordPress builds.

For client sites needing a structured review before remediation work.

A useful audit should explain what matters, why it matters, and what to fix first based on real risk and effort.
The process stays focused on actionable findings rather than theoretical risk lists.
Agree systems, access, and what the audit is expected to cover.
Assess users, software, hosting, backups, configuration, and maintenance habits.
Summarise findings, risk level, evidence, and recommended priorities.
Plan fixes, hardening, monitoring, or further investigation if needed.
Tell us what needs reviewing and why, then we can suggest a practical audit scope.
Common questions before requesting a website security review.
No. This page covers practical website security audits. Penetration testing would need to be separately scoped.
No. We can support technical evidence and remediation, but we do not claim to provide formal certification or auditor sign-off.
Scope can include websites, WordPress, hosting accounts, access, backups, monitoring, and related configuration where access is available.
Remediation can be planned after the audit, but fix work needs to be included or agreed separately.
The output should be practical: what was checked, what was found, why it matters, and what to prioritise.
Yes, but active compromises should usually be cleaned first. An audit can then help identify hardening priorities.